Hands and Results
1 |
♠63
♥KQJ875
♦K74
♣K5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠J754
♥A9432
♦A63
♣7
|
♠AQT9
♥-
♦T82
♣QJ8643
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣6/5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 4♠* W -2 ♥K 3-Boyer-Nordstrom vs 11-Zahirnia-Sandford
200 4.00 1.00 3♥ N +2 ♣Q 9-Doughman-Hoersch vs 7-Sidley-Imrie
170 2.50 2.50 3♥ N +1 8-Spinner-Walters vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
170 2.50 2.50 2♥ N +2 ♣Q 5-Waxler-Bahmanian vs 2-Tatham-Hicks
140 1.00 4.00 2♥ N +1 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
50 0.00 5.00 3♠ W -1 ♥K 6-Chapman-Barkan vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
|
2 |
♠A5
♥Q83
♦7632
♣AJT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠J742
♥JT962
♦KJT
♣K
|
♠Q8
♥A5
♦Q985
♣98543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
210 5.00 0.00 2N N +3 ♥A 3-Boyer-Nordstrom vs 11-Zahirnia-Sandford
200 4.00 1.00 2♠ S +3 ♥J 5-Waxler-Bahmanian vs 2-Tatham-Hicks
180 3.00 2.00 2N N +2 ♣9 9-Doughman-Hoersch vs 7-Sidley-Imrie
150 2.00 3.00 2N N +1 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
120 1.00 4.00 2N N 6-Chapman-Barkan vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
200 0.00 5.00 3♣ S -2 ♥J 8-Spinner-Walters vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
|
3 |
♠T6
♥K4
♦AK42
♣AQJ65
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠AJ732
♥82
♦JT986
♣3
|
♠KQ
♥QT75
♦Q73
♣KT72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 3N N ♣2 8-Spinner-Walters vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
150 4.00 1.00 2N S +1 ♠2 6-Chapman-Barkan vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
110 3.00 2.00 3♣ N ♠K 9-Doughman-Hoersch vs 7-Sidley-Imrie
50 1.50 3.50 2♥ S -1 ♣4 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
50 1.50 3.50 3♣ S -1 ♦J 5-Waxler-Bahmanian vs 2-Tatham-Hicks
150 0.00 5.00 4♥ S -3 ♣3 3-Boyer-Nordstrom vs 11-Zahirnia-Sandford
|
4 |
♠A984
♥J98
♦QT6
♣AT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠T7652
♥4
♦J
♣KJ7653
|
♠J
♥AKQT52
♦AK983
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 2♥ E +2 ♥7 6-Chapman-Barkan vs 3-Boyer-Nordstrom
600 4.00 1.00 3N W 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠K 1-Sachs-Agelidis vs 8-Spinner-Walters
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠K 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
650 0.50 4.50 4♥ E +1 ♠K 9-Doughman-Hoersch vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
650 0.50 4.50 4♥ E +1 ♦4 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 2-Tatham-Hicks
|
5 |
♠T43
♥853
♦JT52
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠AQ8
♥A9642
♦3
♣T765
|
♠972
♥JT
♦K8764
♣932
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.50 0.50 3N S ♥4 6-Chapman-Barkan vs 3-Boyer-Nordstrom
600 4.50 0.50 3N S 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
100 1.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♥6 9-Doughman-Hoersch vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
100 1.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♥4 1-Sachs-Agelidis vs 8-Spinner-Walters
100 1.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♥4 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 2-Tatham-Hicks
100 1.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♥2 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
|
6 |
♠Q9842
♥J87
♦Q5
♣642
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠J
♥AKQ932
♦A973
♣93
|
♠KT63
♥T5
♦J6
♣AKJ75
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2/1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
100 4.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♥8 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
170 3.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♦Q 6-Chapman-Barkan vs 3-Boyer-Nordstrom
600 2.00 3.00 3N E ♦4 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 2-Tatham-Hicks
620 1.00 4.00 4♥ W ♠3 1-Sachs-Agelidis vs 8-Spinner-Walters
650 0.00 5.00 4♥ W +1 ♦Q 9-Doughman-Hoersch vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
|
7 |
♠94
♥8732
♦Q953
♣853
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠KQ62
♥T95
♦JT7
♣T97
|
♠JT3
♥Q64
♦862
♣Q642
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT2/1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 5.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♥T 1-Sachs-Agelidis vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
660 4.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♠K 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 3-Boyer-Nordstrom
240 3.00 2.00 2N S +4 ♥T 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
210 2.00 3.00 2N S +3 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
200 1.00 4.00 2♠ S +3 ♦J 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
180 0.00 5.00 2N S +2 ♦J 10-Schwartz-Hilton vs 8-Spinner-Walters
|
8 |
♠AQ732
♥AK4
♦QT8
♣Q7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠KT9865
♥853
♦32
♣AT
|
♠-
♥JT976
♦K9765
♣K83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♠9 10-Schwartz-Hilton vs 8-Spinner-Walters
460 3.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♠8 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 3-Boyer-Nordstrom
460 3.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♥J 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
460 3.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♥4 1-Sachs-Agelidis vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
400 1.00 4.00 3N S ♠T 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
100 0.00 5.00 2♠ W -2 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
|
9 |
♠KJ3
♥Q54
♦JT654
♣95
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠A74
♥JT
♦K97
♣AK743
|
♠Q86
♥K9732
♦AQ
♣QT6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 5/6♣ 3♦ 5/6♥ 4♠ 5/6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.50 0.50 3N E +1 ♠2 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
630 4.50 0.50 3N E +1 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
660 1.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♠T 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
660 1.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♦5 1-Sachs-Agelidis vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
660 1.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♠4 10-Schwartz-Hilton vs 8-Spinner-Walters
660 1.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♠2 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 3-Boyer-Nordstrom
|
10 |
♠AJ9743
♥-
♦K
♣AKQJ64
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠QT6
♥JT74
♦Q87
♣T97
|
♠-
♥AQ9632
♦AT962
♣52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/5♣ 6♠ 3NT ♦4 ♥3 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ ♣1 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
710 3.00 2.00 5♠ S +2 8-Spinner-Walters vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
710 3.00 2.00 5♠ N +2 ♥A 3-Boyer-Nordstrom vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
710 3.00 2.00 4♠ S +3 ♦T 10-Schwartz-Hilton vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
710 3.00 2.00 4♠ N +3 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 7-Sidley-Imrie
710 3.00 2.00 4♥ S +3 ♥4 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
650 0.00 5.00 5♠ N ♦A 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
|
11 |
♠KT98
♥Q5
♦AT54
♣653
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠AJ65
♥KT2
♦92
♣QT97
|
♠4
♥A863
♦J63
♣AKJ82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 3♣ W 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 7-Sidley-Imrie
120 3.50 1.50 2N E 8-Spinner-Walters vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
120 3.50 1.50 1N E +1 ♥4 3-Boyer-Nordstrom vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
130 1.50 3.50 3♣ E +1 ♥4 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
130 1.50 3.50 3♣ E +1 10-Schwartz-Hilton vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
180 0.00 5.00 2N E +2 ♦K 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
|
12 |
♠KQ65
♥J976
♦A2
♣T32
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠JT74
♥KT85
♦JT3
♣K9
|
♠8
♥AQ432
♦K865
♣QJ4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♥A 10-Schwartz-Hilton vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
170 4.50 0.50 3♠ N +1 ♦5 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
100 3.00 2.00 3♥ E -2 ♦4 3-Boyer-Nordstrom vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
100 1.50 3.50 4♠ N -1 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 7-Sidley-Imrie
100 1.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 8-Spinner-Walters vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
300 0.00 5.00 4♠ N -3 ♠8 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
|
13 |
♠AJ542
♥52
♦Q53
♣AQ3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠863
♥KJ9
♦T962
♣K92
|
♠T9
♥AQT873
♦J874
♣5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣0 ♦6 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 5.00 0.00 5♥* E -4 ♦K 4-Leibovitz-Katz vs 2-Tatham-Hicks
710 3.00 2.00 4♠ N +3 ♣5 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 11-Zahirnia-Sandford
710 3.00 2.00 4♠ N +3 ♣5 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
710 3.00 2.00 4♠ N +3 9-Doughman-Hoersch vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
680 1.00 4.00 4♠ N +2 ♥A 1-Sachs-Agelidis vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
650 0.00 5.00 4♠ N +1 ♥A 3-Boyer-Nordstrom vs 8-Spinner-Walters
|
14 |
♠J6432
♥876
♦QT8
♣J5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠K
♥A5432
♦KJ
♣AQT73
|
♠Q985
♥KQ
♦A7542
♣K9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥0 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 6N E -1 ♥J 9-Doughman-Hoersch vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
460 4.00 1.00 3N E +2 ♥J 4-Leibovitz-Katz vs 2-Tatham-Hicks
490 2.50 2.50 3N E +3 ♣2 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 11-Zahirnia-Sandford
490 2.50 2.50 3N E +3 1-Sachs-Agelidis vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
520 1.00 4.00 3N W +4 ♠3 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
990 0.00 5.00 6N E ♠A 3-Boyer-Nordstrom vs 8-Spinner-Walters
|
15 |
♠K3
♥J82
♦T53
♣J8764
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠9875
♥43
♦K9862
♣AT
|
♠AQJ
♥KT95
♦AQ7
♣Q53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 1N E +2 ♠6 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
180 4.00 1.00 2N E +2 ♥6 4-Leibovitz-Katz vs 2-Tatham-Hicks
430 1.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♠2 3-Boyer-Nordstrom vs 8-Spinner-Walters
430 1.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♠2 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 11-Zahirnia-Sandford
430 1.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♥6 1-Sachs-Agelidis vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
430 1.50 3.50 3N E +1 9-Doughman-Hoersch vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
|
16 |
♠-
♥KQ852
♦KJT8
♣QJ84
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠K
♥9643
♦76432
♣AT5
|
♠7652
♥AT7
♦A
♣K9732
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6/5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4/5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.70 1.30 4♠ S +1 ♦7 8-Spinner-Walters vs 11-Zahirnia-Sandford
450 3.70 1.30 4♠ S +1 ♣A 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
450 3.70 1.30 4♠ S +1 4-Leibovitz-Katz vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
420 0.70 4.30 4♠ S ♣A 1-Sachs-Agelidis vs 7-Sidley-Imrie
420 0.70 4.30 4♠ S ♣A 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
|
17 |
♠Q863
♥Q852
♦AT9
♣KQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠KT
♥974
♦Q87
♣J9865
|
♠74
♥6
♦KJ65432
♣A74
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.70 1.30 4♠ S +1 ♥7 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
450 3.70 1.30 4♠ S +1 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
450 3.70 1.30 5♥ S ♦Q 1-Sachs-Agelidis vs 7-Sidley-Imrie
420 0.70 4.30 4♠ S ♣6 8-Spinner-Walters vs 11-Zahirnia-Sandford
420 0.70 4.30 4♥ S ♣5 4-Leibovitz-Katz vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
|
18 |
♠9
♥98764
♦K2
♣J9832
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠AKT73
♥T3
♦AJ97
♣Q4
|
♠J6542
♥AJ2
♦T654
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣3 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.70 1.30 3♠ W +1 ♥9 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
170 3.70 1.30 3♠ W +1 ♦9 4-Leibovitz-Katz vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
170 3.70 1.30 2♠ W +2 ♥9 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
420 1.30 3.70 4♠ W ♥9 1-Sachs-Agelidis vs 7-Sidley-Imrie
450 0.10 4.90 4♠ W +1 ♠9 8-Spinner-Walters vs 11-Zahirnia-Sandford
|
19 |
♠QJ8753
♥K2
♦Q7
♣K92
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠K4
♥A843
♦A3
♣QJT87
|
♠A9
♥QJT
♦T862
♣A543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 1.00 2N E +1 ♦5 6-Chapman-Barkan vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
150 4.00 1.00 4♣ W +1 ♠Q 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
150 4.00 1.00 3♣ W +2 ♠Q 10-Schwartz-Hilton vs 3-Boyer-Nordstrom
660 1.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♠4 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 8-Spinner-Walters
660 1.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♠2 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 7-Sidley-Imrie
660 1.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♦J 5-Waxler-Bahmanian vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
|
20 |
♠2
♥KQJ83
♦AJ93
♣732
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠KJT85
♥62
♦T
♣AJT86
|
♠A9743
♥A754
♦Q62
♣Q
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 5♣ W -4 ♥K 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 8-Spinner-Walters
170 4.00 1.00 3♠ E +1 ♥8 5-Waxler-Bahmanian vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
400 3.00 2.00 5♦ S -4 ♠J 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
620 2.00 3.00 4♠ E ♥T 6-Chapman-Barkan vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
650 1.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♥K 10-Schwartz-Hilton vs 3-Boyer-Nordstrom
990 0.00 5.00 4♠* E +1 ♠6 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 7-Sidley-Imrie
|
21 |
♠K32
♥KJ764
♦T95
♣J2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠JT976
♥Q985
♦72
♣53
|
♠AQ5
♥2
♦J843
♣AK976
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3/2♦ 2♥ 3/2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 7-Sidley-Imrie
170 4.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♦7 10-Schwartz-Hilton vs 3-Boyer-Nordstrom
110 2.00 3.00 2♥ S ♣5 5-Waxler-Bahmanian vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
110 2.00 3.00 2♥ S 6-Chapman-Barkan vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
110 2.00 3.00 2♥ N ♣A 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
100 0.00 5.00 3♥ N -1 ♣8 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 8-Spinner-Walters
|
22 |
♠9875
♥Q83
♦4
♣KJ843
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠KQT3
♥AK4
♦AJ82
♣75
|
♠AJ642
♥62
♦T7653
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣3 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 5.00 0.10 4♥* S ♣7 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 8-Spinner-Walters
170 4.00 1.30 3♠ E +1 ♥9 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
200 2.50 2.50 3♠ E +2 ♥J 6-Chapman-Barkan vs 2-Tatham-Hicks
-200 AVE+ 2.50 3.00 3♠ E +2 ♦K 10-Schwartz-Hilton vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
300 1.00 3.70 4♥* S -2 ♠K 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
650 0.00 4.90 4♠ E +1 ♥J 3-Boyer-Nordstrom vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
|
23 |
♠JT842
♥6
♦JT43
♣QJ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠K965
♥T543
♦765
♣A9
|
♠A3
♥AKQ98
♦AQ8
♣T43
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♣7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ E ♠7 3-Boyer-Nordstrom vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ E ♥2 10-Schwartz-Hilton vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ E ♣5 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ E 6-Chapman-Barkan vs 2-Tatham-Hicks
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♥2 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 8-Spinner-Walters
680 0.00 5.00 4♥ E +2 ♣5 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
|
24 |
♠AQ
♥QJT
♦A8632
♣J82
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠JT2
♥86
♦QJT5
♣Q653
|
♠K7653
♥A543
♦74
♣AT
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/1♦ 2♥ 1/-♠ 2/1NT ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 1.00 2N S ♠K 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 5-Waxler-Bahmanian
120 4.00 1.00 2N N ♠5 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 8-Spinner-Walters
120 4.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♠8 10-Schwartz-Hilton vs 4-Leibovitz-Katz
100 2.00 3.00 2♠ E -2 ♦K 11-Zahirnia-Sandford vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
100 1.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 ♠J 3-Boyer-Nordstrom vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
150 0.00 5.00 3N N -3 6-Chapman-Barkan vs 2-Tatham-Hicks
|
25 |
♠5
♥53
♦AQT653
♣Q873
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠T98
♥AKT2
♦KJ9842
♣-
|
♠AQ74
♥Q764
♦-
♣A9542
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4/5 ♥3/4 ♠3/4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 ♦7 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 11-Zahirnia-Sandford
200 4.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 ♠5 5-Waxler-Bahmanian vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
100 3.00 2.00 3N E -1 ♣J 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 3-Boyer-Nordstrom
300 2.00 3.00 2♦* N -2 ♥4 4-Leibovitz-Katz vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
500 1.00 4.00 2♦* N -3 ♥4 8-Spinner-Walters vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
800 0.00 5.00 2♦* N -4 ♣A 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
|
26 |
♠KQ874
♥A63
♦A86
♣32
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠JT6
♥-
♦T9732
♣KJT65
|
♠A952
♥8754
♦K4
♣Q94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 3NT ♣5/4 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ S ♦T 5-Waxler-Bahmanian vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ S ♦T 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ S ♣T 4-Leibovitz-Katz vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ S ♣J 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 3-Boyer-Nordstrom
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ S ♣J 8-Spinner-Walters vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ S ♣6 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 11-Zahirnia-Sandford
|
27 |
♠KJ9
♥J8
♦KT652
♣654
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠Q
♥KQ96
♦AJ
♣AKJ932
|
♠AT8542
♥A7542
♦Q
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦4/5 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 2♦ 7♥ 5♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 6♠ E -1 ♦9 7-Sidley-Imrie vs 3-Boyer-Nordstrom
510 4.00 1.00 5♥ W +2 12-Poplawsky-Forrest vs 9-Doughman-Hoersch
980 3.00 2.00 6♥ W 2-Tatham-Hicks vs 11-Zahirnia-Sandford
1010 1.50 3.50 6♥ W +1 ♦2 5-Waxler-Bahmanian vs 10-Schwartz-Hilton
1010 1.50 3.50 6♥ W +1 4-Leibovitz-Katz vs 1-Sachs-Agelidis
1510 0.00 5.00 7♥ W ♥J 8-Spinner-Walters vs 6-Chapman-Barkan
|