Hands and Results
1 |
♠T76
♥AK7
♦QJ9853
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠AKQ8
♥QJ
♦K74
♣KQJ8
|
♠9542
♥986
♦A6
♣7432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 2N W -1 ♦Q 7-Madison-Farhi vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦T 9-Seagren-Seagren vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ E ♦T 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♦T 4-Yates-Chapman vs 1-Bishop-Wright
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♦T 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
|
2 |
♠AQT94
♥AJ986
♦J7
♣K
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠K832
♥Q42
♦AK32
♣A6
|
♠J75
♥KT
♦954
♣T9543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: -/1♣ 1♠ ♣6/7 ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♣T 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♣T 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 9-Seagren-Seagren vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
100 1.00 3.00 3♣ W -2 ♥A 7-Madison-Farhi vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -1 ♦4 4-Yates-Chapman vs 1-Bishop-Wright
|
3 |
♠AQJ72
♥KT982
♦AQ4
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠KT4
♥J5
♦876
♣KJ863
|
♠863
♥AQ63
♦K32
♣Q94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3/2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: -/1♣ ♣6/7 ♦4 ♥3/5 ♠4/5 NT4/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 1♠ N +2 ♠3 7-Madison-Farhi vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
110 3.00 1.00 1♠ N +1 ♦2 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
70 2.00 2.00 1♣ N 9-Seagren-Seagren vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 4-Yates-Chapman vs 1-Bishop-Wright
150 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -3 ♣4 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
|
4 |
♠J
♥Q9832
♦AKJT
♣J76
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠KQ72
♥AJ6
♦732
♣953
|
♠T964
♥K5
♦Q8
♣QT842
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ N +2 ♣3 1-Bishop-Wright vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ N +1 ♣T 7-Madison-Farhi vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ N ♣4 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
300 0.50 3.50 3N S -3 ♠Q 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
300 0.50 3.50 3♥ S -3 ♣3 8-Hill-Lawrence vs 4-Yates-Chapman
|
5 |
♠A8532
♥K92
♦85
♣KQJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠K
♥AQ83
♦AT92
♣AT76
|
♠97
♥J5
♦KQJ743
♣984
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 5♦ E -1 ♠Q 1-Bishop-Wright vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
50 3.50 0.50 4♦ E -1 ♣5 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ E +1 ♠Q 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
150 1.00 3.00 4♦ E +1 ♠Q 7-Madison-Farhi vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
500 0.00 4.00 5♠* N -2 ♦K 8-Hill-Lawrence vs 4-Yates-Chapman
|
6 |
♠KQJ987
♥A8
♦KT75
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠4
♥T65
♦AQ63
♣KT642
|
♠A652
♥J3
♦J84
♣Q853
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣4 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +2 8-Hill-Lawrence vs 4-Yates-Chapman
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♠6 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
450 2.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♠4 1-Bishop-Wright vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
230 1.00 3.00 2♠ N +4 ♣3 7-Madison-Farhi vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ S +1 ♣2 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
|
7 |
♠AKQ63
♥K
♦J65
♣K742
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠JT954
♥J52
♦KT9
♣Q8
|
♠87
♥T863
♦Q842
♣J63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♠J 9-Seagren-Seagren vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
660 3.00 1.00 3N N +2 ♠8 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
630 2.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♦K 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 1-Bishop-Wright
600 0.50 3.50 3N S ♠J 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 4-Yates-Chapman
600 0.50 3.50 3N S ♦T 8-Hill-Lawrence vs 7-Madison-Farhi
|
8 |
♠T7
♥864
♦AK82
♣AK82
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠AJ
♥KT973
♦QJ6
♣Q54
|
♠8632
♥Q5
♦75
♣JT976
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ S +1 ♣4 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ S ♥T 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 1-Bishop-Wright
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ S +1 ♥3 8-Hill-Lawrence vs 7-Madison-Farhi
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 4-Yates-Chapman
50 0.50 3.50 5♦ N -1 ♥Q 9-Seagren-Seagren vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
|
9 |
♠AQ63
♥K94
♦43
♣KQT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠K2
♥AT87
♦Q86
♣J982
|
♠T97
♥Q2
♦KJT52
♣765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3/4 ♦6 ♥3/4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣2 9-Seagren-Seagren vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 ♦J 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
150 2.00 2.00 1N N +2 ♠T 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 1-Bishop-Wright
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ N ♥Q 8-Hill-Lawrence vs 7-Madison-Farhi
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ N ♦T 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 4-Yates-Chapman
|
10 |
♠Q654
♥J
♦K92
♣AKT62
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠AK7
♥A9
♦QT643
♣Q95
|
♠T32
♥KT543
♦J75
♣84
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♣ N +1 ♦5 1-Bishop-Wright vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
100 1.50 2.50 2♥ W -1 ♣A 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
100 1.50 2.50 2♥ W -1 ♣K 9-Seagren-Seagren vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
100 1.50 2.50 2♥ E -1 ♥J 7-Madison-Farhi vs 4-Yates-Chapman
100 1.50 2.50 2♦ E -1 ♣3 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
|
11 |
♠2
♥AQ842
♦73
♣AQT82
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠K85
♥J
♦KQT642
♣J43
|
♠JT9763
♥T3
♦A8
♣K96
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♥K 9-Seagren-Seagren vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♥T 7-Madison-Farhi vs 4-Yates-Chapman
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ N ♦A 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
50 1.00 3.00 5♥ N -1 ♦A 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
590 0.00 4.00 4♠* E ♥3 1-Bishop-Wright vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
12 |
♠T6543
♥-
♦AQ93
♣AT87
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠K7
♥KJ85
♦KT6
♣K943
|
♠J82
♥A9762
♦J742
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ -/1♦ 4♠ 2/3NT ♦6/7 ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ N ♣6 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
600 3.00 1.00 3N S ♣3 1-Bishop-Wright vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
300 2.00 2.00 4♥* W -2 ♠A 7-Madison-Farhi vs 4-Yates-Chapman
100 1.00 3.00 3♥* E -1 ♠A 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -1 ♣6 9-Seagren-Seagren vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
|
13 |
♠A96
♥T8532
♦KJ
♣A92
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠K8742
♥976
♦T973
♣3
|
♠Q3
♥-
♦AQ8652
♣QJ874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ 1♠ 3/1NT ♦3/2 |
EW: 4♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 5♥ N ♣Q 1-Bishop-Wright vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
500 3.00 1.00 7♦* E -2 ♥J 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 7-Madison-Farhi
200 2.00 2.00 5♦* E -1 ♥K 4-Yates-Chapman vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
100 1.00 3.00 5♥ N -1 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
200 0.00 4.00 6♥ N -2 ♦A 8-Hill-Lawrence vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
|
14 |
♠AK8
♥AT942
♦T6
♣K54
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠9632
♥KJ873
♦A
♣QT3
|
♠JT54
♥-
♦KQ732
♣A986
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♠ -/1NT ♥6 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♦5 8-Hill-Lawrence vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
50 3.00 1.00 2♠ E -1 ♦4 1-Bishop-Wright vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
50 3.00 1.00 3♣ W -1 ♠A 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 7-Madison-Farhi
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
140 0.00 4.00 3♠ E ♣2 4-Yates-Chapman vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
15 |
♠A932
♥7
♦KQ5
♣T9874
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠T85
♥QJT65
♦9743
♣2
|
♠KJ
♥K84
♦AT62
♣QJ53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ 3NT ♦5 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ N ♦A 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 ♣Q 1-Bishop-Wright vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♥4 8-Hill-Lawrence vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♣5 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 7-Madison-Farhi
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -2 ♥4 4-Yates-Chapman vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
16 |
♠Q976
♥QJ42
♦9875
♣4
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠AJT2
♥-
♦KQT42
♣KQ73
|
♠K85
♥987653
♦3
♣852
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1NT ♣5/6 ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♦ W -2 ♣4 9-Seagren-Seagren vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
100 2.50 1.50 2♣ S -2 ♦K 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 1-Bishop-Wright
100 2.50 1.50 2♣ S -2 ♦K 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 4-Yates-Chapman
500 0.50 3.50 4♥* N -3 ♦3 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
500 0.50 3.50 3♣* S -3 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs vs 7-Madison-Farhi
|
17 |
♠875
♥A85
♦T86
♣AJT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠KJ96
♥Q7
♦K72
♣Q965
|
♠42
♥T642
♦AJ93
♣K42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ -/1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6/7 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 1N S ♠6 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
50 2.50 1.50 1N S -1 ♠6 9-Seagren-Seagren vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
50 2.50 1.50 1N N -1 ♥2 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs vs 7-Madison-Farhi
100 1.00 3.00 2♦* S -1 ♥Q 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 4-Yates-Chapman
150 0.00 4.00 1N N -3 ♠4 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 1-Bishop-Wright
|
18 |
♠42
♥Q8765
♦J98
♣KQJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠AKT953
♥A
♦AK73
♣T3
|
♠76
♥KJT943
♦T4
♣752
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 1♠ W +2 ♣K 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs vs 7-Madison-Farhi
170 3.00 1.00 2♠ W +2 ♣K 9-Seagren-Seagren vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
200 2.00 2.00 1♠ W +4 ♣K 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 1-Bishop-Wright
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ W ♣K 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♣K 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 4-Yates-Chapman
|
19 |
♠K74
♥AK96
♦AT542
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠J83
♥T842
♦987
♣AT9
|
♠T9652
♥QJ3
♦Q
♣KQ73
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 6♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 4.00 0.00 6♦ S ♦9 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
430 2.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♠3 1-Bishop-Wright vs 7-Madison-Farhi
430 2.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♥2 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
430 2.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♦9 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
170 0.00 4.00 3♦ N +3 4-Yates-Chapman vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
|
20 |
♠AQ
♥A9873
♦J5
♣T973
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠T8
♥QJ64
♦K643
♣654
|
♠KJ976542
♥5
♦Q9
♣K8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 5♥ 5NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣1 ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 5♥ N ♠K 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ N ♠7 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
200 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -2 ♣A 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ E -1 4-Yates-Chapman vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
100 0.00 4.00 6♥ N -1 ♠9 1-Bishop-Wright vs 7-Madison-Farhi
|
21 |
♠K65
♥8754
♦865
♣KQ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠-
♥AQ9
♦QJ72
♣985432
|
♠JT9742
♥KT3
♦KT94
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2NT ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2/1♠ ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N S ♦Q 4-Yates-Chapman vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
100 2.50 1.50 2♠* E -1 ♥2 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
100 2.50 1.50 3♦* E -1 ♦A 1-Bishop-Wright vs 7-Madison-Farhi
470 1.00 3.00 2♠* E ♥2 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
570 0.00 4.00 2♠* E +1 ♦A 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs
|
22 |
♠K86
♥AT2
♦Q43
♣AK82
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠J92
♥Q764
♦9652
♣J5
|
♠AQ43
♥K5
♦KT87
♣Q94
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1/-♠ 1NT ♦6/5 ♠7/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 1N N +2 ♠3 7-Madison-Farhi vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
150 3.50 0.50 1N N +2 ♠3 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
120 2.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♦7 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ S ♠2 4-Yates-Chapman vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
90 0.00 4.00 1N N ♠3 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs vs 1-Bishop-Wright
|
23 |
♠K732
♥-
♦AJ852
♣A874
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠Q865
♥JT986
♦T6
♣K9
|
♠J
♥A752
♦Q93
♣J6532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5/6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 5♠ N -1 ♥A 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs vs 1-Bishop-Wright
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♦T 7-Madison-Farhi vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -1 ♣5 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
200 0.50 3.50 6♠ N -2 ♥A 4-Yates-Chapman vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
200 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -2 ♣3 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
24 |
♠AK6542
♥A3
♦2
♣Q854
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠9
♥KJ52
♦AT84
♣KJ76
|
♠T83
♥T94
♦KJ953
♣T2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣6 7-Madison-Farhi vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ N ♣T 4-Yates-Chapman vs 3-Zellmer-Rowen
300 2.00 2.00 5♦* W -2 ♠A 2-Hilbert-Harel vs 8-Hill-Lawrence
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -1 ♦3 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs vs 1-Bishop-Wright
550 0.00 4.00 5♦* E 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 6-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
25 |
♠AJ3
♥K43
♦AKT763
♣Q
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠T854
♥76
♦95
♣AK862
|
♠KQ
♥JT5
♦Q82
♣J9543
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥1 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♦T 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♣K 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
130 1.50 2.50 2♦ N +2 ♠K 8-Hill-Lawrence vs 1-Bishop-Wright
130 1.50 2.50 2♦ N +2 ♣4 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs vs 4-Yates-Chapman
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ S ♣A 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 7-Madison-Farhi
|
26 |
♠K98
♥K92
♦4
♣JT8763
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠J2
♥T853
♦AQ9873
♣Q
|
♠Q7653
♥6
♦KJ52
♣K42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♦3 8-Hill-Lawrence vs 1-Bishop-Wright
200 2.50 1.50 3♥ S +2 ♠J 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
200 2.50 1.50 3♥ S +2 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 7-Madison-Farhi
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ S +2 ♠J 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs vs 4-Yates-Chapman
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ S ♣Q 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
|
27 |
♠J7
♥KQ5432
♦QT5
♣64
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠K652
♥T9
♦84
♣KQT82
|
♠T8
♥86
♦AJ962
♣A953
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♥ 2/1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 ♥8 10-Parker-Hennessy vs 7-Madison-Farhi
150 3.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♦6 6-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 2-Hilbert-Harel
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ N +1 ♥6 3-Zellmer-Rowen vs 9-Seagren-Seagren
100 1.00 3.00 3N W -2 ♥4 5-Zeitler-Veinbergs vs 4-Yates-Chapman
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♦8 8-Hill-Lawrence vs 1-Bishop-Wright
|