Hands and Results
1 |
♠KJ
♥KJ73
♦QJT98
♣K9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠QT62
♥95
♦7653
♣AJ2
|
♠8754
♥Q42
♦K2
♣8764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 6♥ 4♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 5.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♠2 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 10-Fields-Chan
480 4.00 1.00 4♥ S +2 ♥9 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
450 2.00 3.00 4♥ S +1 ♠6 5-Spinner-Walters vs 2-Moore-Yates
450 2.00 3.00 4♥ S +1 ♠2 9-Brobst-Seagren vs 7-Busby-House
450 2.00 3.00 4♥ S +1 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
430 0.00 5.00 3N S +1 ♠2 3-Cotton-Wright vs 11-Moyer-Herzog
|
2 |
♠AK75
♥T432
♦A9
♣KJ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠JT943
♥8
♦K73
♣AT32
|
♠86
♥AKQJ95
♦Q842
♣4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5/4 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♣6 3-Cotton-Wright vs 11-Moyer-Herzog
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ E +1 ♦J 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 10-Fields-Chan
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ E +1 ♦9 5-Spinner-Walters vs 2-Moore-Yates
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ E +1 ♦5 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
140 2.50 2.50 2♥ E +1 ♣7 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
170 0.00 5.00 2♥ E +2 ♦J 9-Brobst-Seagren vs 7-Busby-House
|
3 |
♠AQT73
♥K974
♦8
♣KJ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠KJ62
♥AJ
♦QT542
♣52
|
♠94
♥Q62
♦K963
♣AQ97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♣7/6 ♦4 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.50 0.50 2♥ N +1 ♦3 3-Cotton-Wright vs 11-Moyer-Herzog
140 4.50 0.50 2♥ N +1 ♣7 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
110 3.00 2.00 2♥ N ♦6 5-Spinner-Walters vs 2-Moore-Yates
110 2.00 3.00 3♦ W ♦8 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
130 1.00 4.00 3♦ W +1 ♠A 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 10-Fields-Chan
150 0.00 5.00 2N W +1 ♥4 9-Brobst-Seagren vs 7-Busby-House
|
4 |
♠Q9864
♥KT7
♦Q9
♣T96
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠A2
♥QJ54
♦A863
♣853
|
♠T73
♥862
♦KJ7
♣AQJ2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 5.00 0.00 1♠ N ♥2 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 3-Cotton-Wright
PASS 4.00 1.00 Pass Out 7-Busby-House vs 10-Fields-Chan
100 3.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♥6 9-Brobst-Seagren vs 5-Spinner-Walters
110 1.50 3.50 2♥ W ♠6 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
110 1.50 3.50 3♣ E ♣3 1-Tatham-Bochenek vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
120 0.00 5.00 1N E +1 ♦2 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 2-Moore-Yates
|
5 |
♠J76
♥976
♦J654
♣KJ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠AT9432
♥83
♦AK7
♣83
|
♠5
♥K4
♦Q983
♣AQT962
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5/4♦ 4/3♠ 5/1NT ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 ♥6 7-Busby-House vs 10-Fields-Chan
140 3.00 2.00 3♠ W ♥6 1-Tatham-Bochenek vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
140 3.00 2.00 3♠ W ♥6 9-Brobst-Seagren vs 5-Spinner-Walters
140 3.00 2.00 3♠ W 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
200 1.00 4.00 3♥ S -2 ♦A 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 2-Moore-Yates
800 0.00 5.00 3♥* S -3 ♦A 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 3-Cotton-Wright
|
6 |
♠5
♥KQ954
♦KJ8
♣A842
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠KJ832
♥AJT6
♦93
♣J7
|
♠QT94
♥8
♦AT762
♣Q53
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠4 |
EW: -/1♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♦6/7 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 ♦8 1-Tatham-Bochenek vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ W ♠5 9-Brobst-Seagren vs 5-Spinner-Walters
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ W ♥K 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 3-Cotton-Wright
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ W ♥K 7-Busby-House vs 10-Fields-Chan
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ W ♥K 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ W ♥K 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 2-Moore-Yates
|
7 |
♠T874
♥AQJ
♦K82
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠J962
♥95
♦Q97
♣JT54
|
♠AQ5
♥T7
♦6543
♣A932
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 5.00 0.00 4N N +1 ♣6 2-Moore-Yates vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
650 2.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♣J 1-Tatham-Bochenek vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
650 2.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♣J 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 5-Spinner-Walters
650 2.50 2.50 4♥ S +1 ♣4 7-Busby-House vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
650 2.50 2.50 4♥ N +1 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 3-Cotton-Wright
620 0.00 5.00 4♥ S ♣4 10-Fields-Chan vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
|
8 |
♠K8632
♥52
♦J764
♣87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠Q5
♥T86
♦852
♣KQT92
|
♠JT7
♥KQ743
♦KT9
♣A4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♥K 2-Moore-Yates vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
110 3.50 1.50 2♠ S ♣K 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 3-Cotton-Wright
110 3.50 1.50 2♠ N ♥3 7-Busby-House vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
110 2.00 3.00 2♥ E 1-Tatham-Bochenek vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
140 1.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 ♣3 10-Fields-Chan vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
150 0.00 5.00 3♣ S -3 ♠Q 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 5-Spinner-Walters
|
9 |
♠T
♥K832
♦Q65
♣QT985
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠952
♥T
♦AK9842
♣A63
|
♠AJ73
♥AJ765
♦T73
♣K
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 5♦ 2♥ 3/2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.00 0.00 4♦ W ♠T 1-Tatham-Bochenek vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
600 3.50 1.50 3N E ♠6 2-Moore-Yates vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
600 3.50 1.50 3N E ♣2 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 3-Cotton-Wright
630 1.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♠K 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 5-Spinner-Walters
630 1.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♠6 10-Fields-Chan vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
630 1.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♣2 7-Busby-House vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
|
10 |
♠A73
♥J5
♦A75
♣Q8632
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠Q9
♥Q74
♦JT982
♣A97
|
♠KJT84
♥KT9832
♦3
♣T
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠3 |
EW: 4♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.50 0.50 4♣ S -1 ♠Q 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
100 4.50 0.50 4♣ N -1 ♥5 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Spinner-Walters
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♥J 10-Fields-Chan vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♣3 2-Moore-Yates vs 7-Busby-House
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♦K 3-Cotton-Wright vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
930 0.00 5.00 3♥* W +1 ♣3 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
|
11 |
♠AQ754
♥J64
♦K754
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠T863
♥875
♦AT8
♣876
|
♠J92
♥KT32
♦2
♣A9432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4/3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.10 1.90 3N S +2 ♥8 3-Cotton-Wright vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
460 3.10 1.90 3N S +2 ♥8 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Spinner-Walters
460 3.10 1.90 3N S +2 ♥8 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
460 3.10 1.90 3N S +2 ♣8 10-Fields-Chan vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
50 0.10 4.90 6♦ S -1 ♥8 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
|
12 |
♠AJT743
♥75
♦Q3
♣A76
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠6
♥K8632
♦T76
♣K943
|
♠9852
♥JT4
♦J985
♣82
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/6♣ 6♦ 3♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥4/3 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
2220 5.00 0.00 7N S ♣9 3-Cotton-Wright vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
2210 4.00 1.00 7♠ N ♠2 10-Fields-Chan vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
1470 2.00 3.00 6N S +1 ♠6 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
1470 2.00 3.00 6N S +1 ♥3 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 5-Spinner-Walters
1470 2.00 3.00 6N S +1 2-Moore-Yates vs 7-Busby-House
720 0.00 5.00 3N S +4 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
|
13 |
♠52
♥96
♦A842
♣JT765
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠Q9873
♥KQT2
♦T95
♣K
|
♠AT4
♥AJ8
♦KQ3
♣A843
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 5.00 0.00 3N E ♥5 3-Cotton-Wright vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
620 3.50 1.50 4♠ W ♥9 4-Madison-Gilliam vs 2-Moore-Yates
620 3.50 1.50 4♠ W ♣6 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 5-Spinner-Walters
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♥9 7-Busby-House vs 11-Moyer-Herzog
660 0.50 4.50 3N E +2 ♥7 1-Tatham-Bochenek vs 10-Fields-Chan
660 0.50 4.50 3N E +2 ♥7 9-Brobst-Seagren vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
|
14 |
♠JT9
♥764
♦9853
♣Q43
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠876532
♥AT
♦T42
♣A5
|
♠AKQ4
♥53
♦QJ6
♣J972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♠* W -1 ♥4 4-Madison-Gilliam vs 2-Moore-Yates
50 4.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥4 9-Brobst-Seagren vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
100 3.00 2.00 5♥* S -1 ♣A 7-Busby-House vs 11-Moyer-Herzog
140 1.50 3.50 3♠ W ♥4 3-Cotton-Wright vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
140 1.50 3.50 3♠ W ♥4 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 5-Spinner-Walters
300 0.00 5.00 5♥* S -2 ♠7 1-Tatham-Bochenek vs 10-Fields-Chan
|
15 |
♠Q853
♥975
♦Q93
♣J92
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠T972
♥A843
♦T5
♣AQ5
|
♠AJ6
♥KJT62
♦876
♣83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 3♦ S ♦T 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 5-Spinner-Walters
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♦A 1-Tatham-Bochenek vs 10-Fields-Chan
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♦A 3-Cotton-Wright vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♦A 4-Madison-Gilliam vs 2-Moore-Yates
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♦A 7-Busby-House vs 11-Moyer-Herzog
170 2.00 3.00 2♥ E +2 ♦A 9-Brobst-Seagren vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
|
16 |
♠KQ6
♥973
♦AKQT543
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠T2
♥J2
♦J976
♣AJT43
|
♠J854
♥AKQ4
♦-
♣K9876
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣1 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ -/1♥ ♦2/3 ♥6/7 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.00 2.00 4♦ N ♥A 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 11-Moyer-Herzog
130 3.00 2.00 4♦ N ♥Q 4-Madison-Gilliam vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
130 3.00 2.00 4♦ N ♥Q 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
130 3.00 2.00 3♦ N +1 ♥9 5-Spinner-Walters vs 3-Cotton-Wright
130 3.00 2.00 2♦ N +2 ♣7 1-Tatham-Bochenek vs 7-Busby-House
250 0.00 5.00 4♠ S -5 ♥J 2-Moore-Yates vs 10-Fields-Chan
|
17 |
♠QJ3
♥J762
♦32
♣QT72
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠A965
♥3
♦754
♣96543
|
♠KT87
♥KT85
♦A9
♣AJ8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.00 0.00 1N* E -2 ♦K 4-Madison-Gilliam vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
110 4.00 1.00 3♦ S ♥3 1-Tatham-Bochenek vs 7-Busby-House
90 3.00 2.00 2♦ N ♠T 2-Moore-Yates vs 10-Fields-Chan
50 2.00 3.00 2♦ N -1 ♦A 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
100 1.00 4.00 2♦ S -2 ♥3 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 11-Moyer-Herzog
150 0.00 5.00 3♦ S -3 ♥6 5-Spinner-Walters vs 3-Cotton-Wright
|
18 |
♠Q2
♥4
♦J8742
♣AJ874
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠76
♥KJT75
♦KQT9
♣KQ
|
♠AK9853
♥A862
♦-
♣963
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥1 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 6♥ 5♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.50 1.50 4♥ W ♦4 2-Moore-Yates vs 10-Fields-Chan
420 3.50 1.50 4♥ W ♦4 5-Spinner-Walters vs 3-Cotton-Wright
420 3.50 1.50 4♥ W ♦4 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
420 3.50 1.50 4♥ W ♦2 4-Madison-Gilliam vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
450 0.50 4.50 4♥ W +1 ♣A 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 11-Moyer-Herzog
450 0.50 4.50 4♥ W +1 ♣5 1-Tatham-Bochenek vs 7-Busby-House
|
19 |
♠9865
♥Q764
♦J8
♣T94
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠A72
♥AK2
♦AQ7
♣QJ32
|
♠KQT
♥9853
♦9642
♣65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2/3♥ 2/3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♣A 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
120 3.50 1.50 1N W +1 ♦J 2-Moore-Yates vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
120 3.50 1.50 1N W +1 ♣T 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
500 2.00 3.00 2♣* S -3 ♥K 10-Fields-Chan vs 3-Cotton-Wright
600 0.50 4.50 3N W ♣T 5-Spinner-Walters vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
600 0.50 4.50 3N W ♣T 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 7-Busby-House
|
20 |
♠J95
♥5
♦J8743
♣A972
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠32
♥KQ873
♦T52
♣K84
|
♠A74
♥T62
♦AKQ
♣QJT6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 NT4/5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♠K 5-Spinner-Walters vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
200 4.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♠K 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 7-Busby-House
140 3.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♦A 2-Moore-Yates vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
100 2.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
140 0.50 4.50 3♥ E ♠K 10-Fields-Chan vs 3-Cotton-Wright
140 0.50 4.50 3♥ E ♣5 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
|
21 |
♠QT2
♥K7532
♦T94
♣63
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠A74
♥AQT
♦K53
♣AQT4
|
♠KJ8
♥9864
♦J8762
♣2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 4.00 1.00 2N W +2 ♠3 2-Moore-Yates vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
180 4.00 1.00 2N W +2 ♥3 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
180 4.00 1.00 1N W +3 ♣6 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
430 1.50 3.50 3N W +1 ♣6 10-Fields-Chan vs 3-Cotton-Wright
430 1.50 3.50 3N W +1 ♣6 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 7-Busby-House
460 0.00 5.00 3N W +2 ♠2 5-Spinner-Walters vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
|
22 |
♠AJ4
♥J754
♦73
♣QJT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠Q96
♥K963
♦JT2
♣K42
|
♠K72
♥AQ2
♦Q94
♣A953
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 5.00 0.00 2N E -5 ♦6 3-Cotton-Wright vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
200 3.50 1.50 2N E -2 ♦6 7-Busby-House vs 5-Spinner-Walters
200 3.50 1.50 2N E -2 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
100 2.00 3.00 2N E -1 ♦6 10-Fields-Chan vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
120 1.00 4.00 2N E ♠3 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
150 0.00 5.00 2N E +1 ♥T 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 2-Moore-Yates
|
23 |
♠K76
♥QJ83
♦QJ65
♣JT
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠A93
♥K65
♦94
♣AQ752
|
♠T8542
♥97
♦AT3
♣943
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ 1/2♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 2.00 2♥ S ♦9 3-Cotton-Wright vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
110 3.00 2.00 2♥ N ♠4 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 2-Moore-Yates
110 3.00 2.00 2♥ N 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
110 3.00 2.00 2♥ N 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
110 3.00 2.00 2♦ S +1 ♦9 7-Busby-House vs 5-Spinner-Walters
140 0.00 5.00 2♠ E +1 ♦3 10-Fields-Chan vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
|
24 |
♠Q982
♥87
♦KQ643
♣AT
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠AT7
♥T963
♦AT9
♣Q64
|
♠KJ65
♥KQ5
♦2
♣KJ982
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♦5 10-Fields-Chan vs 4-Madison-Gilliam
50 4.00 1.00 3♦ S -1 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 8-Huffaker-Huffaker
90 3.00 2.00 1N W ♦4 7-Busby-House vs 5-Spinner-Walters
110 2.00 3.00 3♣ E 11-Moyer-Herzog vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
130 1.00 4.00 3♣ E +1 6-Bishop-Crawford vs 2-Moore-Yates
180 0.00 5.00 1N W +3 ♥8 3-Cotton-Wright vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
|
25 |
♠6
♥J963
♦AKQJ86
♣Q8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠J9542
♥AT54
♦93
♣K3
|
♠T3
♥KQ82
♦74
♣JT764
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 5♦ 1/-♥ 2♠ 4/3NT ♥7/6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥6 ♠4/5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 5.00 0.00 6♦ N ♥3 4-Madison-Gilliam vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
460 4.00 1.00 3N S +2 ♠4 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
430 2.00 3.00 3N N +1 ♥K 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
430 2.00 3.00 3N N +1 ♥2 5-Spinner-Walters vs 10-Fields-Chan
430 2.00 3.00 3N N +1 ♣6 7-Busby-House vs 3-Cotton-Wright
50 0.00 5.00 6♦ N -1 ♥K 2-Moore-Yates vs 11-Moyer-Herzog
|
26 |
♠982
♥K3
♦J
♣AQJ8543
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠AK765
♥QJT87
♦83
♣K
|
♠JT43
♥64
♦QT952
♣97
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣1 ♦5 ♥6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 2.50 5♣ N +1 ♠J 2-Moore-Yates vs 11-Moyer-Herzog
620 2.50 2.50 5♣ N +1 ♠J 5-Spinner-Walters vs 10-Fields-Chan
620 2.50 2.50 5♣ N +1 ♠J 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
620 2.50 2.50 5♣ N +1 ♠4 4-Madison-Gilliam vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
620 2.50 2.50 5♣ N +1 ♥6 7-Busby-House vs 3-Cotton-Wright
620 2.50 2.50 5♣ N +1 ♥6 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
|
27 |
♠-
♥Q65
♦AT987643
♣J5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠Q873
♥K32
♦Q52
♣AQ6
|
♠JT965
♥A
♦K
♣T97432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1/2♣ 4♠ 3NT ♦3/5 ♥3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 5.00 0.00 4♥* S ♠3 12-Boackle Jr-Agelidis vs 9-Brobst-Seagren
420 3.50 1.50 4♥ S ♠3 2-Moore-Yates vs 11-Moyer-Herzog
420 3.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣A 4-Madison-Gilliam vs 1-Tatham-Bochenek
50 2.00 3.00 4♠ E -1 ♦J 7-Busby-House vs 3-Cotton-Wright
50 1.00 4.00 5♥ S -1 ♠3 5-Spinner-Walters vs 10-Fields-Chan
100 0.00 5.00 5♥* S -1 ♠4 8-Huffaker-Huffaker vs 6-Bishop-Crawford
|