Hands and Results
1 |
♠AKQ8
♥T9862
♦A
♣QJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠9752
♥A3
♦KJ65
♣K96
|
♠J
♥K754
♦QT732
♣532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 8.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥A 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 7-Willms-Wightman
170 6.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♠2 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
170 6.50 1.50 2♥ N +2 ♠8 3-Madison-Rodger vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
140 5.00 3.00 3♠ S 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 1-Rowen-Parker
110 4.00 4.00 2♥ N ♠J 4-Willingham-Lane vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
50 3.00 5.00 4♦ E -1 7-Harel-Jada vs 3-Moore-Chan
100 1.50 6.50 4♠ S -2 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 8-Farah-Brand
100 1.50 6.50 3♠ S -2 ♣6 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
110 0.00 8.00 2♦ E +1 ♠3 8-House-Bischoff vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
|
2 |
♠AQ42
♥KT865
♦92
♣Q2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠J
♥9743
♦AKT53
♣763
|
♠K653
♥A
♦J864
♣AT54
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 8.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 ♠T 3-Madison-Rodger vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
110 6.00 2.00 2♦ E +1 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 1-Rowen-Parker
110 6.00 2.00 2♦ E +1 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 8-Farah-Brand
110 6.00 2.00 2♦ E +1 7-Harel-Jada vs 3-Moore-Chan
120 4.00 4.00 1N W +1 ♠2 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
130 1.50 6.50 3♦ W +1 4-Willingham-Lane vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
130 1.50 6.50 3♦ E +1 ♠T 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 7-Willms-Wightman
130 1.50 6.50 2♦ E +2 ♠T 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
130 1.50 6.50 2♦ E +2 ♥Q 8-House-Bischoff vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
|
3 |
♠-
♥AQ42
♦KQ53
♣KT963
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠J5
♥K9853
♦8
♣Q8742
|
♠AKQ742
♥J76
♦A97
♣A
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 2/3♠ ♣5/6 ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♥T 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
100 5.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♥T 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 7-Willms-Wightman
100 5.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♦J 4-Willingham-Lane vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
100 5.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♣J 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 1-Rowen-Parker
100 5.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♣J 7-Harel-Jada vs 3-Moore-Chan
100 5.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♥T 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 8-Farah-Brand
50 2.00 6.00 4♦ N -1 ♠A 3-Madison-Rodger vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
140 1.00 7.00 2♠ E +1 ♦J 8-House-Bischoff vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
650 0.00 8.00 5♥ E ♦J 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
|
4 |
♠98
♥872
♦KJT6
♣K973
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠7652
♥-
♦A9842
♣A642
|
♠AQT4
♥QJT643
♦Q3
♣5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 |
EW: 3♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 8.00 0.00 2♥* E -3 ♣Q 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
150 7.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♦4 8-House-Bischoff vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
100 4.50 3.50 4♠ E -1 ♣Q 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 8-Farah-Brand
100 4.50 3.50 2♠ W -1 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
100 4.50 3.50 2♥ E -1 ♦7 7-Harel-Jada vs 1-Rowen-Parker
100 4.50 3.50 2♥ E -1 ♣Q 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 7-Willms-Wightman
110 1.50 6.50 2♠ W ♠9 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
110 1.50 6.50 1♠ W +1 4-Willingham-Lane vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
140 0.00 8.00 2♠ W +1 ♣3 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
|
5 |
♠QJ75
♥K5
♦73
♣AT875
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠K842
♥J432
♦T86
♣KQ
|
♠6
♥Q98
♦AQJ95
♣J432
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 8.00 0.00 5♦* E -4 ♣9 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
140 6.50 1.50 3♠ N ♠6 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 7-Willms-Wightman
140 6.50 1.50 3♠ N ♣2 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
110 5.00 3.00 2♠ N ♣2 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 8-Farah-Brand
100 4.00 4.00 2♥ W -2 4-Willingham-Lane vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
PASS 2.00 6.00 Pass Out 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
PASS 2.00 6.00 Pass Out 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
PASS 2.00 6.00 Pass Out 8-House-Bischoff vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
100 0.00 8.00 4♠ N -1 7-Harel-Jada vs 1-Rowen-Parker
|
6 |
♠A642
♥AKQJ95
♦K9
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠8
♥4
♦J8742
♣KQ9752
|
♠K753
♥762
♦AT53
♣63
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣5/6 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 5.00 3.00 4♠ S +1 ♣K 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
450 5.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 ♣6 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
450 5.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 ♣6 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 8-Farah-Brand
450 5.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 ♣5 8-House-Bischoff vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
450 5.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 4-Willingham-Lane vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
450 5.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 7-Willms-Wightman
450 5.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
420 1.00 7.00 4♠ S 7-Harel-Jada vs 1-Rowen-Parker
150 0.00 8.00 6♠ S -3 ♣K 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
|
7 |
♠K2
♥AK54
♦Q762
♣Q94
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠A96
♥T93
♦JT
♣T7653
|
♠JT43
♥J762
♦A94
♣A2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4/5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 8.00 0.00 3N N ♠3 8-House-Bischoff vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
300 6.50 1.50 3♣ W -3 7-Harel-Jada vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
300 6.50 1.50 2♣ W -3 ♥A 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 7-Willms-Wightman
150 5.00 3.00 1N N +2 ♠3 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
120 4.00 4.00 1N N +1 ♠4 3-Madison-Rodger vs 3-Moore-Chan
110 2.50 5.50 2♦ N +1 ♠J 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 8-Farah-Brand
110 2.50 5.50 2♦ N +1 ♣A 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
100 1.00 7.00 3N N -1 ♥2 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 1-Rowen-Parker
200 0.00 8.00 3N N -2 ♥6 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
|
8 |
♠AJ8
♥AJ97
♦T3
♣AK93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠KQ742
♥Q4
♦5
♣QJ654
|
♠T9
♥8632
♦AKJ64
♣72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3/4 ♠6 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 8.00 0.00 2♦* E -5 ♦3 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
300 7.00 1.00 2♠* W -2 ♦T 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
180 5.50 2.50 1N N +3 ♦A 8-House-Bischoff vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
180 5.50 2.50 1N N +3 ♦K 3-Madison-Rodger vs 3-Moore-Chan
150 3.50 4.50 2♥ W -3 ♣A 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 1-Rowen-Parker
150 3.50 4.50 2♥ W -3 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
50 2.00 6.00 3♦ S -1 ♠K 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 7-Willms-Wightman
110 0.50 7.50 2♠ W ♦T 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 8-Farah-Brand
110 0.50 7.50 2♠ W ♦T 7-Harel-Jada vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
|
9 |
♠AQJ8
♥T853
♦72
♣A72
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠K63
♥7642
♦K9
♣Q864
|
♠7
♥Q9
♦QT86543
♣JT5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 5.00 3.00 4♠ S +2 ♠3 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 1-Rowen-Parker
480 5.00 3.00 4♠ S +2 ♥7 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
480 5.00 3.00 4♠ S +2 ♥7 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
480 5.00 3.00 4♠ S +2 ♥7 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 7-Willms-Wightman
480 5.00 3.00 4♠ S +2 ♣4 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
480 5.00 3.00 4♠ S +2 ♣4 3-Madison-Rodger vs 3-Moore-Chan
480 5.00 3.00 4♠ S +2 7-Harel-Jada vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
450 0.50 7.50 4♠ S +1 ♥6 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 8-Farah-Brand
450 0.50 7.50 4♠ S +1 ♦K 8-House-Bischoff vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
|
10 |
♠KJ3
♥KQJ43
♦A
♣QT32
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠98
♥A986
♦KQJ973
♣7
|
♠742
♥T752
♦52
♣J654
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 4♥ 6♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦6/5 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 7.00 1.00 6♠ S ♦K 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
1430 7.00 1.00 6♠ S ♦K 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 7-Willms-Wightman
1430 7.00 1.00 6♠ S ♦K 7-Harel-Jada vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
680 3.00 5.00 5♠ S +1 ♦K 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 8-Farah-Brand
680 3.00 5.00 4♠ S +2 ♦K 3-Madison-Rodger vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
680 3.00 5.00 4♠ S +2 ♦K 4-Willingham-Lane vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
680 3.00 5.00 4♠ S +2 ♦K 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
680 3.00 5.00 4♠ S +2 ♣4 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 3-Moore-Chan
200 0.00 8.00 6♠ S -2 ♦K 8-House-Bischoff vs 1-Rowen-Parker
|
11 |
♠J83
♥T4
♦AQ752
♣A72
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠K7542
♥6
♦T9864
♣Q8
|
♠AT6
♥Q9875
♦K3
♣943
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: 1/-♠ ♣3/2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠7/6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 7.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♠6 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 8-Farah-Brand
430 7.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♥7 3-Madison-Rodger vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
400 6.00 2.00 3N N ♥7 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
170 5.00 3.00 2♥ S +2 ♦T 4-Willingham-Lane vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
140 3.50 4.50 3♥ S ♦T 8-House-Bischoff vs 1-Rowen-Parker
140 3.50 4.50 3♥ S ♦T 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 3-Moore-Chan
110 2.00 6.00 3♣ S ♥6 7-Harel-Jada vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
50 1.00 7.00 4♥ S -1 ♦T 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 7-Willms-Wightman
100 0.00 8.00 3N N -2 ♣9 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
|
12 |
♠KT6
♥QT85
♦K643
♣Q7
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠Q932
♥A63
♦AQT
♣K65
|
♠AJ54
♥-
♦98752
♣J982
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 7.50 0.50 2N* W -2 ♥Q 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
300 7.50 0.50 1N* W -2 4-Willingham-Lane vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
150 6.00 2.00 3♠ W -3 ♥8 3-Madison-Rodger vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
110 4.50 3.50 2♥ S ♠3 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 8-Farah-Brand
110 4.50 3.50 2♥ S ♠2 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 7-Willms-Wightman
100 3.00 5.00 5♦ E -2 7-Harel-Jada vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
100 2.00 6.00 3♥ S -1 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 3-Moore-Chan
120 1.00 7.00 1N W +1 ♥5 8-House-Bischoff vs 1-Rowen-Parker
200 0.00 8.00 3♥* S -1 ♠2 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
|
13 |
♠8654
♥K
♦KT97
♣JT76
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠J93
♥T753
♦43
♣A942
|
♠A7
♥9642
♦AQ
♣KQ853
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♠ ♣6/5 ♥6/5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 8.00 0.00 4♥* W -3 ♠8 8-House-Bischoff vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
300 7.00 1.00 3♥ W -3 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
170 5.00 3.00 3♠ S +1 ♦4 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
170 5.00 3.00 2♠ N +2 ♠A 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
170 5.00 3.00 2♠ N +2 ♣K 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 7-Willms-Wightman
140 2.50 5.50 3♠ N ♣K 7-Harel-Jada vs 8-Farah-Brand
140 2.50 5.50 2♠ N +1 ♣K 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
110 1.00 7.00 2♠ N ♣K 3-Madison-Rodger vs 1-Rowen-Parker
90 0.00 8.00 1N E ♥Q 4-Willingham-Lane vs 3-Moore-Chan
|
14 |
♠A843
♥4
♦KQT743
♣T9
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠J9762
♥T
♦A2
♣K6543
|
♠KQ5
♥K98732
♦-
♣A872
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 4♠ ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 8.00 0.00 4♦* N 7-Harel-Jada vs 8-Farah-Brand
150 7.00 1.00 4♦ N +1 ♠K 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
130 5.50 2.50 4♦ N ♠K 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
130 5.50 2.50 4♦ N 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
100 3.00 5.00 4♠ W -2 ♦K 8-House-Bischoff vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
100 3.00 5.00 3♥ E -2 ♠A 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 7-Willms-Wightman
100 3.00 5.00 2♥ E -2 4-Willingham-Lane vs 3-Moore-Chan
50 1.00 7.00 5♠ W -1 ♦K 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
100 0.00 8.00 5♦* N -1 ♠K 3-Madison-Rodger vs 1-Rowen-Parker
|
15 |
♠A2
♥T854
♦963
♣AKT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠QT4
♥AK7632
♦T7
♣62
|
♠J876
♥J9
♦KJ5
♣Q953
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 8.00 0.00 3♥* W -3 ♣A 8-House-Bischoff vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
300 7.00 1.00 2♥* W -2 ♣A 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
180 6.00 2.00 2N N +2 ♥J 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 7-Willms-Wightman
150 4.00 4.00 2N N +1 ♥J 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
150 4.00 4.00 1N N +2 ♥J 4-Willingham-Lane vs 3-Moore-Chan
150 4.00 4.00 1N E -3 ♠3 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
130 2.00 6.00 3♣ N +1 7-Harel-Jada vs 8-Farah-Brand
120 1.00 7.00 1N N +1 ♥J 3-Madison-Rodger vs 1-Rowen-Parker
50 0.00 8.00 2♥ W -1 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
|
16 |
♠KQJT7
♥6
♦98765
♣A2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠8
♥AT842
♦AJT
♣QJ53
|
♠A63
♥KQ973
♦Q4
♣K76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 6♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 4.00 5♥ W +1 ♠K 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
680 4.00 4.00 5♥ W +1 ♠K 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 8-Farah-Brand
680 4.00 4.00 5♥ W +1 ♠K 3-Madison-Rodger vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
680 4.00 4.00 5♥ W +1 ♠K 4-Willingham-Lane vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
680 4.00 4.00 5♥ W +1 ♠K 8-House-Bischoff vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
680 4.00 4.00 5♥ W +1 ♠K 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 1-Rowen-Parker
680 4.00 4.00 5♥ W +1 ♠K 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 3-Moore-Chan
680 4.00 4.00 4♥ W +2 ♠K 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
680 4.00 4.00 4♥ W +2 ♠K 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
|
17 |
♠JT63
♥AJ
♦2
♣KQ8432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠AK94
♥KT83
♦9864
♣A
|
♠Q852
♥95
♦AT53
♣J65
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 7.94 0.06 2♥ S ♦9 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 8-Farah-Brand
100 6.81 1.19 3♦* W -1 ♥A 3-Madison-Rodger vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
50 4.00 4.00 3♠ W -1 ♥A 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
50 4.00 4.00 3♠ E -1 ♦K 8-House-Bischoff vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
50 4.00 4.00 3♠ E -1 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
50 4.00 4.00 2♠ E -1 ♦K 4-Willingham-Lane vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
AVE- AVE+ 3.20 4.80 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
50 1.19 6.81 3♣ N -1 ♣5 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 3-Moore-Chan
110 0.06 7.94 2♠ E ♣T 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 1-Rowen-Parker
|
18 |
♠AJ9
♥QJ54
♦974
♣A92
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠Q8732
♥8632
♦AKQ
♣6
|
♠6
♥A9
♦T8532
♣KQT85
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 8.00 0.00 2N W -2 ♥4 3-Madison-Rodger vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
90 7.00 1.00 1N E 4-Willingham-Lane vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
110 5.50 2.50 3♦ W ♦4 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
110 5.50 2.50 3♣ E ♦J 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 8-Farah-Brand
120 3.50 4.50 2N E ♦J 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
120 3.50 4.50 1N E +1 ♠4 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 3-Moore-Chan
180 2.00 6.00 2N E +2 ♣3 8-House-Bischoff vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
280 1.00 7.00 2♦* E +1 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 1-Rowen-Parker
1100 0.00 8.00 1N* S -4 ♦A 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
|
19 |
♠3
♥J6
♦AKJ973
♣KJ64
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠AKQT2
♥KQ73
♦86
♣73
|
♠J876
♥95
♦T542
♣T52
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣1 ♦2 ♥4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 8.00 0.00 6♣ S ♠A 3-Madison-Rodger vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
420 6.00 2.00 4♥ S ♠A 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
420 6.00 2.00 4♥ S ♠A 7-Harel-Jada vs 7-Willms-Wightman
420 6.00 2.00 5♣ S +1 ♠A 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
170 4.00 4.00 4♣ S +2 ♠A 4-Willingham-Lane vs 1-Rowen-Parker
150 2.00 6.00 4♦ N +1 ♠J 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
150 2.00 6.00 3♦ N +2 ♥9 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
150 2.00 6.00 3♣ N +2 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 3-Moore-Chan
100 0.00 8.00 4♥ S -2 ♠A 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
|
20 |
♠86
♥Q9
♦AJ32
♣KJ864
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠QJ
♥T62
♦QT986
♣QT7
|
♠KT752
♥KJ73
♦74
♣A2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 8.00 0.00 3♠ E -3 ♣9 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
200 7.00 1.00 2♠ E -2 ♠3 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
120 5.50 2.50 2N S 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 3-Moore-Chan
120 5.50 2.50 2N S 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
110 4.00 4.00 3♣ N ♦7 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
100 3.00 5.00 2♠ E -1 ♣9 4-Willingham-Lane vs 1-Rowen-Parker
100 2.00 6.00 3♦ N -1 7-Harel-Jada vs 7-Willms-Wightman
110 1.00 7.00 2♠ E ♠3 3-Madison-Rodger vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
200 0.00 8.00 2N S -2 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
|
21 |
♠KQ3
♥985
♦J42
♣KJ75
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠98652
♥AQJ3
♦A
♣Q93
|
♠J4
♥K42
♦98753
♣AT4
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 7.94 0.06 1N N +1 ♠J 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
110 6.81 1.19 1♠ W +1 ♦2 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
140 4.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♦2 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
140 4.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 ♦2 3-Madison-Rodger vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
140 4.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 4-Willingham-Lane vs 1-Rowen-Parker
140 4.00 4.00 2♠ W +1 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
170 1.19 6.81 2♠ W +2 ♣5 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 3-Moore-Chan
300 0.06 7.94 3♦ S -3 ♠9 7-Harel-Jada vs 7-Willms-Wightman
|
22 |
♠5
♥T652
♦K52
♣AKT87
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠AT3
♥J943
♦T3
♣Q954
|
♠92
♥Q
♦AQJ9864
♣J32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 4♠ ♦5/4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2NT ♣5 ♥2 ♠2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 7.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 4-Willingham-Lane vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
450 7.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♠9 7-Harel-Jada vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
420 3.50 4.50 4♠ S ♦T 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 3-Moore-Chan
420 3.50 4.50 4♠ S ♦T 3-Madison-Rodger vs 7-Willms-Wightman
420 3.50 4.50 4♠ S ♦T 8-House-Bischoff vs 8-Farah-Brand
420 3.50 4.50 4♠ S ♦T 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 1-Rowen-Parker
420 3.50 4.50 4♠ S 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
420 3.50 4.50 4♠ S 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
200 0.00 8.00 3♦* E -1 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
|
23 |
♠K75
♥Q62
♦J943
♣KT4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠63
♥AT853
♦AKQ72
♣6
|
♠42
♥KJ4
♦T8
♣AQJ973
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥0 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 5♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 8.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
100 6.50 1.50 4♥ W -1 ♠5 4-Willingham-Lane vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
100 6.50 1.50 5♦ W -1 ♠5 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 1-Rowen-Parker
620 3.00 5.00 4♥ W ♠5 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 3-Moore-Chan
620 3.00 5.00 4♥ W ♠5 7-Harel-Jada vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
620 3.00 5.00 4♥ W ♠5 8-House-Bischoff vs 8-Farah-Brand
620 3.00 5.00 4♥ W 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
620 3.00 5.00 4♥ E ♠A 3-Madison-Rodger vs 7-Willms-Wightman
1100 0.00 8.00 4♠* S -4 ♦K 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
|
24 |
♠54
♥9
♦Q87532
♣AK73
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠T72
♥K83
♦KJ
♣JT864
|
♠A963
♥AQT62
♦A64
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 8.00 0.00 4♥ E -3 ♠K 7-Harel-Jada vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
50 6.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 ♦T 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 3-Moore-Chan
50 6.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 ♠K 4-Willingham-Lane vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
50 6.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
110 4.00 4.00 2♥ E ♠K 8-House-Bischoff vs 8-Farah-Brand
140 1.50 6.50 3♥ E ♦T 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
140 1.50 6.50 3♥ E ♣2 3-Madison-Rodger vs 7-Willms-Wightman
140 1.50 6.50 2♥ E +1 ♠K 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
140 1.50 6.50 2♥ E +1 ♠K 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 1-Rowen-Parker
|
25 |
♠842
♥AJ4
♦QT5
♣A754
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠AT63
♥T9
♦A986
♣Q93
|
♠K9
♥KQ87632
♦732
♣2
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1/-♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♦7/6 ♠5/4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 8.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♠Q 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
50 7.00 1.00 3N N -1 ♥K 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
100 6.00 2.00 3N N -2 7-Harel-Jada vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
140 5.00 3.00 3♥ E 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 1-Rowen-Parker
170 4.00 4.00 3♥ E +1 ♠Q 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 3-Moore-Chan
300 2.50 5.50 3N N -6 ♥K 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
300 2.50 5.50 3N N -6 ♦3 8-House-Bischoff vs 7-Willms-Wightman
730 0.50 7.50 3♥* E ♠Q 4-Willingham-Lane vs 8-Farah-Brand
730 0.50 7.50 3♥* E ♥5 3-Madison-Rodger vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
|
26 |
♠AQJT652
♥-
♦K74
♣KJ9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠973
♥J862
♦-
♣AQ8542
|
♠4
♥KQT7543
♦QJ865
♣-
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 4♦ 3/4♠ 4NT ♥1 |
EW: 5♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
850 8.00 0.00 5♠* N 7-Harel-Jada vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
650 7.00 1.00 5♠ N ♥Q 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 3-Moore-Chan
620 6.00 2.00 4♠ S ♣A 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
500 4.50 3.50 6♥* E -2 ♠K 4-Willingham-Lane vs 8-Farah-Brand
500 4.50 3.50 5♥* E -2 ♠K 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
200 2.50 5.50 4♠* E -1 ♠K 3-Madison-Rodger vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
200 2.50 5.50 5♥* E -1 ♠K 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 1-Rowen-Parker
100 1.00 7.00 6♠ N -1 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
650 0.00 8.00 5♥ E ♠K 8-House-Bischoff vs 7-Willms-Wightman
|
27 |
♠653
♥JT7532
♦-
♣9542
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠A7
♥AKQ8
♦K7643
♣AQ
|
♠T982
♥4
♦AT85
♣KJT8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3/4 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 6.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥J 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
430 6.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥J 4-Willingham-Lane vs 8-Farah-Brand
430 6.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥5 1-Chapman-Oakley vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
430 6.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥5 7-Harel-Jada vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
430 6.00 2.00 3N W +1 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 1-Rowen-Parker
490 3.00 5.00 3N W +3 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 3-Moore-Chan
500 2.00 6.00 3♥* N -3 ♥5 3-Madison-Rodger vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
990 1.00 7.00 6N W ♥5 8-House-Bischoff vs 7-Willms-Wightman
1700 0.00 8.00 4♦* N -7 ♠T 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
|
28 |
♠Q63
♥Q762
♦Q865
♣72
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠KT7
♥A9
♦92
♣AKT843
|
♠A942
♥KT83
♦AJT4
♣9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 8.00 0.00 3N E ♠5 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
430 5.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♠5 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 3-Moore-Chan
430 5.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♠4 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 8-Farah-Brand
430 5.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♥4 8-House-Bischoff vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
430 5.50 2.50 3N E +1 4-Willingham-Lane vs 7-Willms-Wightman
460 1.50 6.50 3N W +2 ♠3 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
460 1.50 6.50 3N W +2 ♥2 7-Harel-Jada vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
460 1.50 6.50 3N W +2 ♦5 3-Madison-Rodger vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
460 1.50 6.50 3N E +2 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
|
29 |
♠8532
♥AJ6
♦AT42
♣Q2
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠KJ97
♥932
♦J7
♣K654
|
♠AT6
♥K84
♦Q853
♣JT3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5/6 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 8.00 0.00 2♠ E -2 ♦6 3-Madison-Rodger vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
90 7.00 1.00 1N S ♠7 7-Harel-Jada vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
PASS 5.00 3.00 Pass Out 4-Willingham-Lane vs 7-Willms-Wightman
PASS 5.00 3.00 Pass Out 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
PASS 5.00 3.00 Pass Out 8-House-Bischoff vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
100 2.50 5.50 1N S -1 ♠7 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
100 2.50 5.50 3♥ S -1 ♠7 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 3-Moore-Chan
300 0.50 7.50 3N S -3 ♣4 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
300 0.50 7.50 2N S -3 ♣4 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 8-Farah-Brand
|
30 |
♠J65
♥7652
♦K974
♣92
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠Q9
♥K983
♦T63
♣AJT7
|
♠K874
♥AJT4
♦QJ
♣864
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
470 8.00 0.00 2♠* S ♥8 3-Madison-Rodger vs 5-Holsclaw-Walters
50 7.00 1.00 3♥ W -1 ♦4 6-Hudson-Goldberg vs 2-Mercer-Bradley
90 6.00 2.00 1N E ♦4 9-Doughman-LeBendig vs 8-Farah-Brand
100 4.50 3.50 3♦ S -2 ♠Q 2-Seagren-Shapley vs 3-Moore-Chan
100 4.50 3.50 1♣ S -2 ♦3 8-House-Bischoff vs 6-Goldsmith-Gagnon
110 2.50 5.50 2♥ W ♦4 10-Diamond-Gilliam vs 10-Andrecht-Andrecht
110 2.50 5.50 2♥ W 4-Willingham-Lane vs 7-Willms-Wightman
140 0.50 7.50 3♥ W ♦4 5-Brilmyer-Johnson vs 9-Boackle Jr-Agelidis
140 0.50 7.50 2♥ W +1 ♦K 7-Harel-Jada vs 4-Braunstein-Tatham
|