Hands and Results
1 |
♠42
♥AKJ5
♦AJ85
♣T94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠K65
♥T93
♦KQ
♣KJ632
|
♠AJ873
♥76
♦T742
♣A8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 7.00 1.00 3♥ N -2 ♣A 1-Carson-Casey vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
100 7.00 1.00 3♥ N -2 ♣A 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 9-Magde-Magde
100 7.00 1.00 3♥ N -2 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
110 5.00 3.00 2♠ E ♦9 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 3-Robinson-Posters
140 2.50 5.50 3♠ E ♥2 6-Boll-Boll vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
140 2.50 5.50 2♠ E +1 ♥2 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
140 2.50 5.50 2♠ E +1 ♦9 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 6-Provol-Bierman
140 2.50 5.50 2♠ E +1 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
150 0.00 8.00 4♥ N -3 ♣A 9-Locke-White vs 8-Zevely-Patel
|
2 |
♠AKJ93
♥QT4
♦54
♣Q85
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠Q8
♥AKJ983
♦JT92
♣K
|
♠T74
♥6
♦AKQ7
♣JT632
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 8.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠A 9-Locke-White vs 8-Zevely-Patel
100 7.00 1.00 2♠ N -1 ♥6 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 3-Robinson-Posters
140 4.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 ♠A 1-Carson-Casey vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
140 4.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 ♠A 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
140 4.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 ♠A 6-Boll-Boll vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
140 4.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 ♦5 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 9-Magde-Magde
140 4.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
170 1.00 7.00 2♥ W +2 ♠A 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 6-Provol-Bierman
500 0.00 8.00 3♠* N -2 ♦A 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
|
3 |
♠Q542
♥KQ52
♦J542
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠KJ9
♥T64
♦T
♣Q65432
|
♠863
♥A973
♦AK73
♣T8
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 8.00 0.00 3♣ W -3 ♥K 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
120 6.00 2.00 2N S ♣4 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
120 6.00 2.00 2N S ♣4 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 9-Magde-Magde
120 6.00 2.00 2N S ♣4 6-Boll-Boll vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
110 4.00 4.00 2♦ S +1 ♣4 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 6-Provol-Bierman
50 2.00 6.00 3N S -1 ♣4 9-Locke-White vs 8-Zevely-Patel
50 2.00 6.00 2N S -1 ♥4 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 3-Robinson-Posters
50 2.00 6.00 2N S -1 ♣4 1-Carson-Casey vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
100 0.00 8.00 2N S -2 ♣3 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
|
4 |
♠8
♥J873
♦AQJ92
♣A42
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠K653
♥AQT65
♦K87
♣7
|
♠A42
♥2
♦543
♣QT9653
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♦ 2♥ -/1♠ 3NT ♣6/7 ♠6/7 |
EW: ♣5/6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 8.00 0.00 3N N ♥2 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
300 7.00 1.00 3♣ E -3 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 6-Provol-Bierman
200 6.00 2.00 3♠ W -2 ♠8 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 8-Zevely-Patel
180 4.00 4.00 2N N +2 ♥2 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
180 4.00 4.00 2N N +2 ♣T 6-Boll-Boll vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
180 4.00 4.00 2N N +2 ♣5 1-Carson-Casey vs 9-Magde-Magde
150 2.00 6.00 2N N +1 ♣9 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 3-Robinson-Posters
110 1.00 7.00 3♦ N ♥2 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
100 0.00 8.00 3♦ N -1 ♥2 9-Locke-White vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
|
5 |
♠Q98742
♥A64
♦AT8
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠J
♥Q9
♦QJ743
♣KQJT8
|
♠KT
♥J852
♦652
♣7532
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 6/5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 8.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♥5 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 3-Robinson-Posters
650 5.00 3.00 5♠ N 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 8-Zevely-Patel
650 5.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♥2 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 6-Provol-Bierman
650 5.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♦6 1-Carson-Casey vs 9-Magde-Magde
650 5.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♦6 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
650 5.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♣7 6-Boll-Boll vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
230 2.00 6.00 3♠ N +3 ♦5 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
200 0.50 7.50 3♠ N +2 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
200 0.50 7.50 2♠ N +3 ♦6 9-Locke-White vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
|
6 |
♠J
♥Q3
♦AT963
♣K9642
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠KQ3
♥K765
♦J54
♣A83
|
♠T7652
♥AJT42
♦Q7
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 8.00 0.00 4♦ N ♥A 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
100 7.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♣Q 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
50 6.00 2.00 4♦ N -1 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
80 5.00 3.00 1♠ E 9-Locke-White vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
140 3.50 4.50 3♥ W ♦J 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 3-Robinson-Posters
140 3.50 4.50 3♥ E ♦2 1-Carson-Casey vs 9-Magde-Magde
170 2.00 6.00 2♥ E +2 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 8-Zevely-Patel
200 0.50 7.50 2♥ E +3 ♠4 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 6-Provol-Bierman
200 0.50 7.50 2♥ E +3 ♣Q 6-Boll-Boll vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
|
7 |
♠A7
♥A52
♦K76
♣J7653
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠K4
♥T9764
♦Q
♣KQ842
|
♠T532
♥Q8
♦AT932
♣T9
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 7.50 0.50 3N N ♥Q 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 3-Robinson-Posters
600 7.50 0.50 3N N ♥Q 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
150 6.00 2.00 2N N +1 ♥Q 1-Carson-Casey vs 8-Zevely-Patel
100 3.50 4.50 3N S -1 ♦Q 6-Boll-Boll vs 9-Magde-Magde
100 3.50 4.50 3N N -1 ♥Q 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
100 3.50 4.50 3N N -1 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
100 3.50 4.50 3N N -1 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
200 0.50 7.50 3N S -2 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
200 0.50 7.50 4♠ S -2 ♣K 9-Locke-White vs 6-Provol-Bierman
|
8 |
♠AKQJ4
♥T7
♦AK7432
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠T65
♥J86
♦T965
♣J64
|
♠98
♥K92
♦J8
♣KQT972
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 6♦ 6♥ 7♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 8.00 0.00 6♠ N +1 ♣K 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
980 7.00 1.00 6♠ N ♣K 6-Boll-Boll vs 9-Magde-Magde
510 4.50 3.50 4♠ N +3 ♠8 9-Locke-White vs 6-Provol-Bierman
510 4.50 3.50 4♠ N +3 ♣K 1-Carson-Casey vs 8-Zevely-Patel
510 4.50 3.50 4♠ N +3 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 3-Robinson-Posters
510 4.50 3.50 4♠ N +3 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
490 2.00 6.00 4N S +2 ♦T 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
480 1.00 7.00 4♠ N +2 ♣K 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
260 0.00 8.00 3♠ N +4 ♣K 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
|
9 |
♠K72
♥T43
♦A5
♣T9872
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠QJT4
♥Q862
♦KJ76
♣4
|
♠A65
♥AJ5
♦QT4
♣AKJ6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 8.00 0.00 4N E -1 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
600 6.50 1.50 3N E ♦9 6-Boll-Boll vs 9-Magde-Magde
600 6.50 1.50 3N E ♦9 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
630 3.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♠9 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
630 3.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♦9 1-Carson-Casey vs 8-Zevely-Patel
630 3.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♦9 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
630 3.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♦9 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 3-Robinson-Posters
630 3.00 5.00 3N E +1 ♦9 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
660 0.00 8.00 3N E +2 ♦2 9-Locke-White vs 6-Provol-Bierman
|
10 |
♠42
♥KQJ642
♦43
♣Q53
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠QJ83
♥9
♦J7652
♣A42
|
♠AT97
♥AT87
♦AQT9
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 5♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 8.00 0.00 3♥ N ♣7 9-Locke-White vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
100 7.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥K 1-Carson-Casey vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
100 6.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♣7 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 9-Magde-Magde
150 4.00 4.00 3♦ E +2 ♥5 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 6-Provol-Bierman
150 4.00 4.00 3♦ E +2 ♥5 6-Boll-Boll vs 8-Zevely-Patel
150 4.00 4.00 3♦ E +2 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
200 1.50 6.50 3♥* N -1 ♥7 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
200 1.50 6.50 4♣ S -2 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 3-Robinson-Posters
620 0.00 8.00 4♠ W ♣3 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
|
11 |
♠KQT53
♥7
♦K943
♣A96
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠974
♥AT6
♦T2
♣KJT52
|
♠AJ8
♥KJ854
♦QJ87
♣3
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5/6 |
EW: 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 8.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 ♠6 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 6-Provol-Bierman
100 6.50 1.50 3♥ E -2 ♠6 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 9-Magde-Magde
100 6.50 1.50 3♥ E -2 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
50 4.50 3.50 3♥ E -1 ♠6 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
50 4.50 3.50 2♥ E -1 ♠6 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 3-Robinson-Posters
100 2.50 5.50 3♠ N -2 ♣3 6-Boll-Boll vs 8-Zevely-Patel
100 2.50 5.50 3♠ N -2 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
110 1.00 7.00 2♥ E ♠6 1-Carson-Casey vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
120 0.00 8.00 2N E ♠6 9-Locke-White vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
|
12 |
♠K987
♥J
♦9642
♣AKQT
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S |
|
♠QJT532
♥K762
♦3
♣72
|
♠A64
♥Q43
♦AQJT5
♣83
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠3 |
EW: 2♠ ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 8.00 0.00 3♠* W -2 ♣A 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
150 6.50 1.50 3♠ W -3 ♥J 9-Locke-White vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
150 6.50 1.50 4♣ N +1 ♠A 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 3-Robinson-Posters
100 4.50 3.50 4♠ W -2 ♣A 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 9-Magde-Magde
100 4.50 3.50 3♠ W -2 ♥J 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 6-Provol-Bierman
100 3.00 5.00 3N N -1 ♦A 6-Boll-Boll vs 8-Zevely-Patel
110 2.00 6.00 2♠ W ♣A 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
200 0.50 7.50 3N N -2 ♠A 1-Carson-Casey vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
200 0.50 7.50 3♠ W +2 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
|
13 |
♠Q762
♥AK64
♦KT
♣T43
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both |
|
♠T8
♥QJT3
♦AJ6
♣A876
|
♠J95
♥82
♦Q953
♣KQ92
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♥Q 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
140 6.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♥Q 9-Locke-White vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
140 6.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 3-Robinson-Posters
140 6.50 1.50 2♠ N +1 ♦3 1-Carson-Casey vs 6-Provol-Bierman
110 2.50 5.50 2♠ S ♥Q 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 8-Zevely-Patel
110 2.50 5.50 2♠ S ♥Q 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 9-Magde-Magde
110 2.50 5.50 2♠ S 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
110 2.50 5.50 2♠ N ♥Q 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
100 0.00 8.00 2♠ S -1 ♥3 6-Boll-Boll vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
|
14 |
♠543
♥AT62
♦853
♣AK2
|
Dlr: East Vul: None |
|
♠KJ
♥KJ3
♦AJ64
♣9843
|
♠Q82
♥Q97
♦K2
♣QT765
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 8.00 0.00 2♠ S -1 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 9-Magde-Magde
90 6.50 1.50 1N E ♠7 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 8-Zevely-Patel
90 6.50 1.50 1N E 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 3-Robinson-Posters
120 4.50 3.50 1N W +1 ♠T 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
120 4.50 3.50 1N E +1 ♠7 1-Carson-Casey vs 6-Provol-Bierman
150 1.50 6.50 1N E +2 ♠7 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
150 1.50 6.50 1N E +2 ♠7 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
150 1.50 6.50 1N E +2 ♠7 6-Boll-Boll vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
150 1.50 6.50 1N E +2 ♠7 9-Locke-White vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
|
15 |
♠T4
♥AKJT3
♦JT64
♣Q6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S |
|
♠K76
♥Q76
♦932
♣A742
|
♠Q853
♥542
♦A75
♣K98
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 8.00 0.00 3N N ♠3 6-Boll-Boll vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
180 7.00 1.00 2N N +2 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 9-Magde-Magde
150 5.00 3.00 2N N +1 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
150 5.00 3.00 1N S +2 ♠6 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
150 5.00 3.00 2♣ W -3 ♥A 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 8-Zevely-Patel
120 3.00 5.00 1N S +1 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 3-Robinson-Posters
PASS 2.00 6.00 Pass Out 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
100 0.50 7.50 3N S -1 ♣2 9-Locke-White vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
100 0.50 7.50 2N S -1 ♣2 1-Carson-Casey vs 6-Provol-Bierman
|
16 |
♠KJ64
♥74
♦7
♣AKQT32
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W |
|
♠9832
♥KQ3
♦65
♣J984
|
♠QT5
♥AT865
♦AK93
♣6
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 8.00 0.00 3♥ E -2 ♣7 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
130 7.00 1.00 4♣ N ♦A 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
110 5.50 2.50 3♣ N ♥A 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
110 5.50 2.50 3♣ N ♦A 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
100 4.00 4.00 3♥ E -1 ♣7 9-Locke-White vs 3-Robinson-Posters
100 2.00 6.00 2N S -2 ♥K 1-Carson-Casey vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
100 2.00 6.00 3♦ S -2 ♥K 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 9-Magde-Magde
100 2.00 6.00 3♦ S -2 ♥K 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 8-Zevely-Patel
800 0.00 8.00 4♠* N -4 ♦A 6-Boll-Boll vs 6-Provol-Bierman
|
17 |
♠Q86
♥AKT52
♦A82
♣42
|
Dlr: North Vul: None |
|
♠AKJ
♥Q643
♦T7
♣A853
|
♠T7532
♥7
♦QJ96
♣Q76
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5/3 ♦5 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
470 8.00 0.00 2♥* N 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
170 7.00 1.00 2♥ N +2 ♦Q 1-Carson-Casey vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
150 6.00 2.00 4♠ E -3 ♥J 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 8-Zevely-Patel
140 4.00 4.00 3♥ N ♦Q 6-Boll-Boll vs 6-Provol-Bierman
140 4.00 4.00 2♥ N +1 ♦Q 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
140 4.00 4.00 2♥ N +1 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
110 1.50 6.50 2♥ N ♠5 9-Locke-White vs 3-Robinson-Posters
110 1.50 6.50 2♥ N ♦Q 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 9-Magde-Magde
100 0.00 8.00 3♥ N -2 ♦6 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
|
18 |
♠AK8
♥6
♦AJ76
♣AKJ54
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S |
|
♠QJT6
♥AQJ87
♦K2
♣Q6
|
♠7432
♥K
♦QT854
♣732
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 7.50 0.50 3♠* W -2 ♣A 1-Carson-Casey vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
300 7.50 0.50 1♥* W -2 ♣A 6-Boll-Boll vs 6-Provol-Bierman
150 6.00 2.00 2N N +1 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
120 5.00 3.00 2N N 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 8-Zevely-Patel
100 2.50 5.50 3♠* W -1 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
100 2.50 5.50 1♥* W -1 ♣A 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 9-Magde-Magde
100 2.50 5.50 1♥* W -1 ♣A 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
100 2.50 5.50 1♥* W -1 ♣A 9-Locke-White vs 3-Robinson-Posters
200 0.00 8.00 5♣ S -2 ♠Q 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
|
19 |
♠K7
♥A85
♦AT63
♣T872
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W |
|
♠98
♥QJ42
♦K5
♣KQJ96
|
♠QJ6432
♥T7
♦Q92
♣A5
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 7.50 0.50 3♠ E -2 ♦8 6-Boll-Boll vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
200 7.50 0.50 2♠ E -2 ♦4 1-Carson-Casey vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
100 4.50 3.50 2N W -1 ♦3 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 8-Zevely-Patel
100 4.50 3.50 2♠ E -1 ♥3 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 6-Provol-Bierman
100 4.50 3.50 2♠ E -1 ♣4 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 9-Magde-Magde
100 4.50 3.50 2♠ E -1 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
110 1.00 7.00 2♠ E ♥3 9-Locke-White vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
110 1.00 7.00 2♠ E ♦4 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 3-Robinson-Posters
110 1.00 7.00 2♠ E 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
|
20 |
♠J862
♥K62
♦82
♣8432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both |
|
♠94
♥J43
♦AKQ43
♣QJT
|
♠AK75
♥AQT87
♦7
♣A95
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥0 ♠3/2 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5/4♦ 6♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 8.00 0.00 3N E ♣6 9-Locke-White vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
620 7.00 1.00 4♥ E ♠3 1-Carson-Casey vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
660 5.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♠2 6-Boll-Boll vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
660 5.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♣2 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
680 4.00 4.00 4♥ E +2 ♣6 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 3-Robinson-Posters
690 3.00 5.00 3N E +3 ♦J 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 9-Magde-Magde
1430 1.00 7.00 6♥ E ♥5 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 8-Zevely-Patel
1430 1.00 7.00 6♥ E ♦J 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
1430 1.00 7.00 6♥ E ♣6 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 6-Provol-Bierman
|
21 |
♠A652
♥832
♦852
♣Q95
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S |
|
♠Q7
♥54
♦KJ74
♣AT864
|
♠KT94
♥AK7
♦Q63
♣K72
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.50 1.50 3N E -2 ♥Q 1-Carson-Casey vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
100 6.50 1.50 3N E -2 ♥Q 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 6-Provol-Bierman
100 6.50 1.50 3N E -2 ♥9 6-Boll-Boll vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
100 6.50 1.50 3N E -2 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
50 3.00 5.00 3N E -1 ♥Q 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 8-Zevely-Patel
50 3.00 5.00 3N E -1 ♥Q 9-Locke-White vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
50 3.00 5.00 3N E -1 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 9-Magde-Magde
400 1.00 7.00 3N E 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
430 0.00 8.00 3N E +1 ♥Q 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 3-Robinson-Posters
|
22 |
♠73
♥AQ92
♦62
♣KJ743
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W |
|
♠A85
♥KT84
♦AJT4
♣A9
|
♠T92
♥73
♦Q753
♣QT86
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/2♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦4/5 ♥6/8 NT5/6 |
EW: -/1♣ 2♦ ♣6/7 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 8.00 0.00 1N W -2 ♠7 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
110 7.00 1.00 2♠ S ♦J 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
100 5.00 3.00 1N W -1 ♥2 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
100 5.00 3.00 1N W -1 ♣4 1-Carson-Casey vs 3-Robinson-Posters
100 5.00 3.00 1N W -1 ♣4 6-Boll-Boll vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
50 3.00 5.00 2♠ S -1 ♣A 9-Locke-White vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
90 1.50 6.50 1N W ♣4 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 9-Magde-Magde
90 1.50 6.50 1N W 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 8-Zevely-Patel
100 0.00 8.00 2♣ N -2 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 6-Provol-Bierman
|
23 |
♠32
♥AT876
♦85432
♣Q
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both |
|
♠754
♥J542
♦AKQ
♣T63
|
♠AKJ986
♥9
♦J9
♣K874
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ 1/-NT ♦5 ♥5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.50 2.50 3♠ E +1 ♥K 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
170 5.50 2.50 3♠ E +1 ♥K 6-Boll-Boll vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
170 5.50 2.50 2♠ E +2 ♥K 1-Carson-Casey vs 3-Robinson-Posters
170 5.50 2.50 2♠ E +2 ♥K 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
170 5.50 2.50 2♠ E +2 ♥K 9-Locke-White vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
170 5.50 2.50 2♠ E +2 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 8-Zevely-Patel
300 2.00 6.00 3♣ S -3 ♦A 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 9-Magde-Magde
620 0.50 7.50 4♠ E ♥K 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
620 0.50 7.50 4♠ E ♥K 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 6-Provol-Bierman
|
24 |
♠2
♥Q8765
♦9864
♣J97
|
Dlr: West Vul: None |
|
♠-
♥K932
♦QJ53
♣AKT86
|
♠AKT9743
♥T
♦AK
♣Q32
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥4 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 3♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 8.00 0.00 6♠ E -3 ♥A 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 6-Provol-Bierman
50 5.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♥A 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
50 5.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♦T 6-Boll-Boll vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
50 5.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♣5 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
50 5.50 2.50 6♣ W -1 ♠2 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
170 3.00 5.00 3♠ E +1 ♣5 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 9-Magde-Magde
420 2.00 6.00 4♠ E ♥A 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 8-Zevely-Patel
450 0.50 7.50 4♠ E +1 ♦2 9-Locke-White vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
450 0.50 7.50 4♠ E +1 ♣5 1-Carson-Casey vs 3-Robinson-Posters
|
25 |
♠QJ
♥K986543
♦JT2
♣8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W |
|
♠AK98
♥7
♦KQ65
♣AK32
|
♠32
♥Q
♦A987
♣QJT964
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣1 ♦0 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 8.00 0.00 4♣ E +2 ♥A 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
300 7.00 1.00 4♥* N -2 ♣Q 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
500 6.00 2.00 5♥* N -3 ♣Q 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 6-Provol-Bierman
620 2.50 5.50 5♣ E +1 ♥A 1-Carson-Casey vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
620 2.50 5.50 5♣ E +1 ♥A 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 8-Zevely-Patel
620 2.50 5.50 5♣ E +1 ♥A 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
620 2.50 5.50 5♣ E +1 ♥A 6-Boll-Boll vs 3-Robinson-Posters
620 2.50 5.50 5♣ E +1 ♥A 9-Locke-White vs 9-Magde-Magde
620 2.50 5.50 5♣ E +1 ♦4 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
|
26 |
♠T83
♥96
♦K86
♣KQ654
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both |
|
♠AJ4
♥AKQ843
♦QT
♣J2
|
♠K76
♥T752
♦J7432
♣7
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.50 1.50 3♥ W +1 ♣K 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 8-Zevely-Patel
170 6.50 1.50 3♥ W +1 ♣K 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
170 6.50 1.50 3♥ W +1 ♣K 6-Boll-Boll vs 3-Robinson-Posters
170 6.50 1.50 3♥ W +1 ♣K 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
620 2.50 5.50 4♥ W ♠T 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 6-Provol-Bierman
620 2.50 5.50 4♥ W ♥6 1-Carson-Casey vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
620 2.50 5.50 4♥ W ♣K 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
620 2.50 5.50 4♥ W ♣K 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
800 0.00 8.00 5♣* S -3 ♥A 9-Locke-White vs 9-Magde-Magde
|
27 |
♠AT9632
♥T752
♦JT
♣A
|
Dlr: South Vul: None |
|
♠K74
♥AQ3
♦Q9643
♣86
|
♠Q
♥J4
♦AK852
♣KQT42
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦2 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 8.00 0.00 3♣ E ♠5 1-Carson-Casey vs 2-Gelman-Dickson
150 6.00 2.00 4♦ W +1 ♣A 2-Sottosanti-Winkler vs 4-Davidson-Phillips
150 6.00 2.00 4♦ W +1 ♣A 4-Sandford-Zahirnia vs 8-Zevely-Patel
150 6.00 2.00 4♦ W +1 ♣A 5-Van Hemert-Zissen vs 1-Dubois-Wightman
170 4.00 4.00 4♦ E +2 ♠5 6-Boll-Boll vs 3-Robinson-Posters
400 2.00 6.00 5♦ W ♠A 3-Manaster-Elsberry vs 6-Provol-Bierman
400 2.00 6.00 5♦ W ♣A 8-Wilson-Nakhleh vs 7-Margolin-Hansen
400 2.00 6.00 5♦ E ♠5 9-Locke-White vs 9-Magde-Magde
430 0.00 8.00 3N W +1 7-Wilf-Wilf vs 5-Shepperd-Chin-Fenton
|